There has been some discussion recently about enlarging the area of my neighborhood association. As of the moment, it encompasses the area between Amory, Boylston, Green, and Washington Streets. My opinion is that the BNA should become smaller, and break up into at least two neighborhood associations, and perhaps as many as four.
The reason for my line of thought is that I think the neighborhood association should follow the crimewatch model of encompassing a small area. The concept behind the crimewatch group is that you're getting together with a small enough group of people that you can all get to know one another. It helps to be geographically compact so you can easily distribute information and call one another if you see something going on. It makes meeting planning simpler too, since you're more likely to be able to find a central meeting area that isn't too far out of the way.
Although many people are moving their discussions online to places like Facebook and various Intranet sites, I think we're still a ways away from being able to carry on a conversation online and reach a decision. Just imagine if you had fifty people having a conversation online--how many emails would it take to make a proposal, have a discussion, and come to an agreement? If you have any ideas on how to handle this, I'm all ears.
Those of you out there who belong to other neighborhood associations--what do you do? Do you have big meetings? Small meetings? In-person meetings? Online meetings? How often do you meet? Does your neighborhood association encompass a large area? How do you keep everyone informed?
Thanks for listening--I hope to hear back from some of you in the near future.
--Diane(:^]
You need to be a member of Neighbors for Neighbors to add comments!
Join Neighbors for Neighbors